Author summary
98% 2 analyzed articles/videos 961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Vora results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,644 hits . Analysis detected 11,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,192 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,986 of 6,611 authors). This Neil Vora is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Neil Vora
Author details
Total words: 7,192
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.0% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.9% 22.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 13.7% 13.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 13.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst