Author summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ila Bell results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,301 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,779 of 6,382 authors). This Ila Bell is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Ila Bell
Author details
Total words: 2,301
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst