Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sarahkim results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 195 hits . Analysis detected 851 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,533 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Sarahkim is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sarahkim
Author details
Total words: 1,533
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst