Author summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maura Hohman results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Unattributed Quote , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 180 hits . Analysis detected 1,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 807 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (684 of 6,348 authors). This Maura Hohman is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Maura Hohman
Author details
Total words: 807
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.2% percentile 6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles807 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 14.9% 14.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.7% 20.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 22.3% 22.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.5% 12.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 22.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 14.9%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst