Author summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Jacoby results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 46.6% saturation with 828 hits . Analysis detected 1,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,292 of 6,603 authors). This Sarah Jacoby is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Sarah Jacoby
Author details
Total words: 1,776
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.4% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 46.6% 46.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.3% 9.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Author 46.6%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst