Keyword summary
84% 54 analyzed articles/videos 36,825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamas results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 23,711 hits . Analysis detected 209,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 169,565 analyzed words across 54 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (22,874 of 34,703 keywords). This Hamas is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Hamas
Keyword details
Total words: 169,565
Article count: 54
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score54 analyzed articles169.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst