Keyword summary
40% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Iran Relations results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,468 hits . Analysis detected 16,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,739 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,929 of 37,536 keywords). This US Iran Relations is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. US Iran Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 18,739
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst