Author summary
75% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cameron Arcand results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,851 hits . Analysis detected 15,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,182 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,658 of 6,208 authors). This Cameron Arcand is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Cameron Arcand
Author details
Total words: 12,182
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.2% percentile 2.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst