The Naval Blockade in the Strait of Hormuz Is Back 57%

By Cameron Arcand75%

7/13/2026, 7:37:02 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Special Pleading, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 1,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 401 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,415 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the article peer group.

The Naval Blockade against Iran by the United States is starting once again at 4 p.m. 
EST. 
Central Command confirmed President Donald Trump’s announced from earlier on Monday, as the ceasefire is effectively over. 
“The resumption of the U.S. blockade against Iran follows the initial implementation from April 13 to June 18,” CENTCOM posted to X on Monday afternoon. 
“CENTCOM forces redirected more than 140 compliant vessels, disabled nine non-compliant ships, and allowed over 50 commercial vessels supporting humanitarian aid to pass through the blockade during the two-month period,” the statement continued. 
The major waterway, which is largely used for the transportation of cargo like oil, has been the major point of contention throughout the war, including after the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed last month. 
Despite the MOU, Iran continued to launch strikes against cargo ships in the strait multiple times, leading to continued strikes by the U.S. in response. 
As recently as Sunday, the U.S. hit "dozens of targets" in a continued military effort against the Islamic Republic, according to CENTCOM. 
On Monday, the president also announced that the U.S. would be seeking 20% reimbursement in order to allow ships to come through the strait. 
“The U.S.A. will be, from this point forward, known as ‘THE GUARDIAN OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT,’ but as such, and as a matter of FAIRNESS, will be reimbursed, at the rate of 20% on all cargo shipped, for any and all costs necessary to do the job of providing safety and security to this very volatile section of the World,” he said in a Truth Social post on Monday. 
In response to the news about the 20% charge, Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi sarcastically posted to X that "POTUS is absolutely right." 
"Whoever provides secure and safe passage of commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz should be compensated for this service," he said, despite recent strikes against ships by the Iranian military. 
"Iran has always been the GUARDIAN of the Strait and will remain so FOREVER.20% is of course too much. 
We will be fair," he claimed. 
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.2%Cameron Arcand: 3.0%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Cameron Arcand: 2.3%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic8.7%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.4%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.1%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 4.0%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 31.2%Cameron Arcand: 15.2%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect31.2%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.3%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.6%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 1.1%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.7%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 39.7%Cameron Arcand: 14.2%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias39.7%This article: 11.0%Cameron Arcand: 5.9%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.7%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 6.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.7%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias6.0%This article: 4.2%Cameron Arcand: 3.2%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 1.1%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Cameron Arcand: 0.9%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect8.2%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.8%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.7%Cameron Arcand: 2.0%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias11.7%This article: 4.7%Cameron Arcand: 0.5%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Cameron Arcand: 3.9%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem6.0%This article: 4.2%Cameron Arcand: 0.3%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man4.2%This article: 8.7%Cameron Arcand: 4.3%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority8.7%This article: 6.0%Cameron Arcand: 2.0%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma6.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.1%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 3.1%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 1.6%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.5%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.2%Cameron Arcand: 10.9%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion4.2%This article: 4.7%Cameron Arcand: 3.0%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question4.7%This article: 6.2%Cameron Arcand: 3.1%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.2%This article: 7.7%Cameron Arcand: 1.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque7.7%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.4%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.8%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 4.7%Cameron Arcand: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman4.7%This article: 13.0%Cameron Arcand: 2.4%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 17.2%Cameron Arcand: 0.6%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading17.2%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 5.8%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 17.2%Cameron Arcand: 5.0%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection17.2%This article: 6.7%Cameron Arcand: 7.7%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice6.7%This article: 7.5%Cameron Arcand: 3.1%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination7.5%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 21.4%Cameron Arcand: 6.2%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias21.4%This article: 6.7%Cameron Arcand: 3.7%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.7%

401 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers65%attributed speech141writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 17 words • 100.0% coverageCENTCOM • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCENTCOM • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCENTCOM • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 69 words • 100.0% coverageSeyed Abbas Araghchi • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSeyed Abbas Araghchi • 31 words • 0.0% coverageSeyed Abbas Araghchi • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSeyed Abbas Araghchi • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTownhall • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words27% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%President Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +87.9 ptsWriter: 12.1%President Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-21.3 ptsWriter: 21.3%President Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.2 ptsWriter: 9.2%President Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.1 ptsWriter: 7.1%President Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.