Topic summary
65% 49 analyzed articles/videos 24,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctions results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 16,469 hits . Analysis detected 126,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 133,298 analyzed words across 49 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,027 of 15,256 topics). This Sanctions is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Sanctions
Topic details
Total words: 133,298
Article count: 49
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score49 analyzed articles133.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst