Author summary
60% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Didi Kirsten Tatlow results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 740 hits . Analysis detected 7,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,998 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,947 of 6,628 authors). This Didi Kirsten Tatlow is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Didi Kirsten Tatlow
Author details
Total words: 6,998
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst