Author summary
66%5 analyzed articles/videos2,916 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Bellan results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 888 hits. Analysis detected 11,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,737 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,173 of 6,316 authors). This Rebecca Bellan is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Rebecca Bellan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
50%Rebecca Bellan (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,737
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate