Author summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 772 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Fleischman results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 440 hits . Analysis detected 2,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,839 of 6,169 authors). This Jon Fleischman is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Jon Fleischman
Author details
Total words: 2,316
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.0% 19.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst