Author summary
79% 19 analyzed articles/videos 5,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ebony Davis results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 4,458 hits . Analysis detected 38,913 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,869 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,892 of 6,135 authors). This Ebony Davis is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Ebony Davis
Author details
Total words: 34,869
Article count: 19
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score19 analyzed articles34.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst