BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 693 faulty-reasoning hits from 579 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.7% and a BS Rank of 64% (7,898 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the article peer group.

Cam covered the speech last night, but you know the media will go off the rails in the coming days: President Trump spoke at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, which was rescheduled after an assassination attempt on the president cut the original event short in April. 
Cole Allen tried to barge into the main dining hall with a shotgun, where Trump and his officials were the targets. 
Last night’s dinner was at the Waldorf Astoria in DC. 
Thankfully, no one attempted political violence, though the president did take a katana to the fake news press, most of whom hated being there. 
It’s no surprise: it’s a room where everyone dislikes each other. 
It was still incredible: The Wall Street Journal winning an award for publishing that story about Trump sending Jeffrey Epstein a birthday card, an apocryphal story at best—Trump shook the hands of the reporters from the publication who won the award. 
Still, the Associated Press was not pleased with the remarks: 
President Donald Trump returned to the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association dinner Friday night, delivering a rambling, hour-long speech that praised some journalists, took potshots at others, made jokes about public figures’ weight and intellect, and quipped about a third presidential term. 
Among other targets of Trump’s humor: Late-night hosts Jimmy Fallon and Jimmy Kimmel; Rep. 
Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.; California Gov. 
Gavin Newsom; former New Jersey Gov. 
Chris Christie; and Trump’s own speechwriters, whose jokes he sometimes criticized even as he delivered them. 
Some of the comments flirted with racism. 
Oh, it wouldn’t be a Trump story from the establishment press if shoddy allegations of racism weren’t lobbed. 
Insults? 
These people insult Trump and his supporters daily, though the joke about Kaitlin Collins, Dylan Mulvaney, and Bud Light was a bit harsh, but it’s what it is. 
Of course, CNN’s PR shop issued a statement. 
Scott Jennings offered a calm and straightforward opinion, noting that the speech's start was good with the denunciation of political violence and the joke about RFK killing the cow that provided dinner meat. 
However, the ending included some jokes that didn’t land and wouldn’t be well-received, coming off as a bit “onery”: 
He started the speech with something that I thought was good and necessary. 
We do not yield to political violence. 
I thought that was probably the best line of the speech, given the nature of the event tonight. 
And he ended the speech by saying, I have great respect for your profession. 
Now, the middle of it is going to be controversial because some of the jokes landed. and some of the jokes didn't. 
I thought the best joke was the RFK joke. 
You know, I hope you enjoyed the beef. 
He ran over the cow. 
That -- I think that was -- was probably the best joke of some of the jokes veered off into very, sort of ornery insults, and that's not going to land for many audiences. 
But I did like the part about not yielding to political violence, and I did like the fact that he did show respect to the press and their role in our American politics. 
Yet, an iconic image was Trump wearing a Trump 2028 hat, with the WHCA logo in the back, and its current president, CBS News’ Weijia Jiang, visibly uncomfortable with the bravado. 
The ‘oh s**t’ look is visible, which made this photo absolute cinema. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.3%Matt Vespa: 6.0%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias12.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.7%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.5%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.8%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.1%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.8%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Matt Vespa: 8.3%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.4%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.1%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.2%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Matt Vespa: 14.0%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.3%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.3%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Matt Vespa: 4.9%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.9%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Matt Vespa: 2.0%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.7%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.0%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Matt Vespa: 0.8%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect8.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Matt Vespa: 6.2%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem3.1%This article: 3.1%Matt Vespa: 1.3%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man3.1%This article: 5.7%Matt Vespa: 3.7%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority5.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.0%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.2%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.3%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.0%Matt Vespa: 9.4%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization6.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.5%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.4%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 8.6%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 7.1%Matt Vespa: 2.4%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question7.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.9%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 4.8%Matt Vespa: 0.5%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque4.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.0%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.3%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 1.8%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.2%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 3.0%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 2.6%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.6%Matt Vespa: 18.5%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice11.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 4.3%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 0.7%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 23.1%Matt Vespa: 13.0%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias23.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Vespa: 4.9%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

579 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers44%attributed speech326writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 42 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 13 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 7 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 18 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 14 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 22 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 9 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 8 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 5 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 34 words • 0.0% coverageScott Jennings • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Scott Jennings

52%flagged-word coverage
163 attributed words64% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Politically Right Leaning -41.1 ptsWriter: 41.1%Scott Jennings: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.6 ptsWriter: 20.6%Scott Jennings: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.