Topic summary
⁠41%2 analyzed articles/videos1,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Correspondents Association Dinner results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 3,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,783 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,300 of 15,791 topics). This White House Correspondents Association Dinner is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
White House Correspondents Association Dinner
Topic details
Total words: 4,783
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos