Author summary
74% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Bauder results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Loss Aversion , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,273 hits . Analysis detected 7,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,204 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,618 of 6,169 authors). This David Bauder is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. David Bauder
Author details
Total words: 6,204
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.8% 19.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Loss Aversion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst