Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 918 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Haleluya Hadero results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Loss Aversion , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.9% saturation with 843 hits . Analysis detected 4,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (476 of 6,196 authors). This Haleluya Hadero is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. Haleluya Hadero
Author details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.3% percentile 8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 25.4% 25.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 38.8% 38.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 45.9% 45.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 19.7% 19.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 45.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 38.8%, sitewide 19.2% Loss Aversion: Author 25.4%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst