Keyword summary
66% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Correspondents' Association results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 445 hits . Analysis detected 3,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,009 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,719 of 37,536 keywords). This White House Correspondents' Association is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. White House Correspondents' Association
Keyword details
Total words: 3,009
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst