Author summary
49% 2 analyzed articles/videos 928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dade Hayes results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 374 hits . Analysis detected 3,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,095 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,116 of 6,341 authors). This Dade Hayes is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Dade Hayes
Author details
Total words: 3,095
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.6% 11.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst