Speaker summary
51% 13 analyzed articles/videos 1,014.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Jennings results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 253.12 hits . Analysis detected 2,295.32 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,014.667 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,416 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Jennings is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. Scott Jennings
Speaker details
Total words: 1,014.667
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 5.6% BS Score13 analyzed videos1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 22.3% 22.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Horn Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Composition/Division: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Middle Ground: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst