Townhall84%

Democrats Unanimously Opposed the Working Families Tax Cuts. Now They're Trying to Take Credit for It. 56%

By Amy Curtis89%

7/9/2026, 9:50:54 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 339 hits. Analysis detected 2,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,081 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.2% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,784 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the article peer group.

Trump Administration Threatens Oregon Leaders With Criminal Prosecution for Letting Illega... 
More Platner Grappling in the Press; An ICE Shooting Has the Bulwark Gang... 
250 Years After Independence, New Index Asks Whether Government Is Stifling America's Char... 
How Low Can She Go? 
As Prosecutors Lay Out Case Against Tyler Robinson,... 
Here's the Problem With Modern-Day Immigration, According to Milton Friedman 
It's Not Just Democrats Who Have Lost Faith in the Free Market 
NH Casino Owner Pleads Guilty to Stealing $255K in COVID-19 Relief Funds 
Boston Accounting Firm Owner Sentenced in $1.6 Million Under-the-Table Pay Scheme 
The United States Is Still Talking to Iran After Big Strikes 
West Virginia Woman Pleads Guilty to Stealing $160K From Disabled Veteran 
This Canadian Woman Just Exposed the Fatal Flaws of Universal Healthcare 
Boston Store Owner Sentenced After $7 Million SNAP Fraud Scheme 
Susan Collins Already Defeated One of Her Possible Democrat Challengers 
Talarico Has Another Tenet of His Fake Christianity 
Shortly before Independence Day, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) released an ad celebrating the one-year anniversary of the Working Families Tax Cut . 
President Trump signed the tax cuts into law on July 4, 2025, and thanks to that legislation, American families saw their refunds increase by 11 percent, some 25 million taxpayers took advantage of the No Tax on Overtime provisions, while millions of other Americans kept more money in their pockets thanks to the No Tax on Tips and No Tax on Social Security. 
Small business owners saw their tax bill reduced by $7,000, and any American child born between 2025 and 2028 can receive $1,000 in a Trump Account, which can set them up for generational wealth down the road. 
All told, 97 percent of filers received a tax cut this past tax season, and $82 billion was returned to American taxpayers. 96 percent of filers who received a tax cut earned less than $200,000, with those earning between $100,000 and $200,000 receiving an average tax cut of over $1,250. 
Almost 70 percent of filers who received a tax cut earned less than $100,000. 
The Working Families Tax Cuts also prevented a $5 trillion tax hike, the largest in American history. 
It's proof that Republicans' pro-growth, pro-worker policies deliver for American families. 
Democrats, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, lambasted the bill, and Democrats unanimously opposed this legislation. 
Arizona Democrat Amish Shah called the Working Families Tax Cuts 'abominable' and called for their 'wholesale repeal.' 
But now that it's clear the Working Families Tax Cuts are helping American families, the Democrats who opposed them are trying to take credit for the legislation and its successes. 
Voters have a right to know that Democrats are trying to pull the wool over their eyes on who is helping American families. 
How Low Can She Go? 
As Prosecutors Lay Out Case Against Tyler Robinson, Owens Offers to Help Defense 
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION 
Michigan Rep. 
Kristen McDonald Rivet ran two television ads in her district, ads funded with taxpayer dollars, in which she claims to have ' passed the Working Families Tax Credit' and that she's helping Michigan families ' claim the Working Families Tax Credit .' 
If McDonald Rivet is trying to tout the Michigan 'working families tax credit' that the state passed years ago, she's definitely trying to mislead voters by pretending she supported President Trump's Working Families Tax Cuts. 
McDonald Rivet voted against those tax cuts . 
Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona introduced a bill to make Trump Accounts permanent and automatically enroll newborns in the program. 
He renames them 'American Dream Accounts' to hide the fact that these accounts were the idea of Republicans and President Trump. 
He also introduced a bill to make the No Tax on Tips provision permanent . 
Gallego voted against the Working Families Tax Cuts, too. 
In Nevada, Reps. 
Dina Titus, Steven Horsford, and Susie Lee, as well as Senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen wrote a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent 'to ensure the successful implementation' of the No Tax on Tips provision for their constituents and other tipped workers. 
All these Nevada legislators voted no on the Working Families Tax Cuts, including the No Tax on Tips provision, even though they admitted that they are "lawmakers representing our nation’s most hospitality and service industry dependent economy." 
Rep. 
Tom Suozzi of New York grudgingly admitted there were things he liked in the One Big, Beautiful Bill and, along with Ohio Rep. 
Emilia Sykes, introduced a bill to expand eligibility for No Tax on Overtime. 
They both voted against the legislation. 
Reps. 
Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri and Sharice Davids of Kansas issued a joint press release announcing they helped secure funding for World Cup security. 
Rep. 
Nellie Pou of New Jersey also took credit for the funding. 
They all trashed the Working Families Tax Cuts and voted against the legislation. 
They also voted repeatedly to keep the Department of Homeland Security, which managed World Cup security, closed. 
"With their unanimous opposition to the Working Families Tax Cuts, Congressional Democrats in unison voted against the average American family receiving between $2,300 and $3,750 in tax relief  with 97% of all tax filers receiving a tax cut  and $1000 investment accounts for every newborn citizen in America," said House Speaker Mike Johnson. 
"They also voted against no tax on tips and overtime, the doubled child tax credit, and $50 billion for rural healthcare. 
Now, as tens of millions of citizens are benefiting from this historic tax relief, Democrats are attempting to mislead the American people and claim credit for something they opposed vehemently. 
Republicans will not let the American people forget that if Democrats had it their way, every taxpayer would have faced the largest tax increase in American history." 
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Platner Is a Hilarious Symptom of Progressive Failure 
Mamdani's Embittered Fourth of July Rant to America 
Scott Jennings Reveals the Real Reason Democrats Turned on Graham Platner 
Trending on Townhall Videos 
State Dept Responds Accordingly to News of Mamdani Official's Plan to Meet With Iran's UN Ambassador 
Judge Sparkle Rejects Court Order Dismissing Her Ruling Against Election Integrity Measure 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.7%Amy Curtis: 8.6%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias13.7%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.9%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Amy Curtis: 3.8%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic6.2%This article: 2.4%Amy Curtis: 0.7%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 4.1%Amy Curtis: 0.5%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias4.1%This article: 10.5%Amy Curtis: 2.1%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 10.8%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.4%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Amy Curtis: 1.0%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 2.5%Amy Curtis: 2.8%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias2.5%This article: 31.4%Amy Curtis: 15.5%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias31.4%This article: 2.0%Amy Curtis: 0.6%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 3.8%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Amy Curtis: 4.7%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias2.3%This article: 7.9%Amy Curtis: 6.0%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias7.9%This article: 1.0%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.7%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 1.2%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Amy Curtis: 8.3%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem9.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 4.3%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.9%Amy Curtis: 4.2%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority1.9%This article: 2.5%Amy Curtis: 2.6%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma2.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.8%Amy Curtis: 16.6%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization1.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.9%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.1%Amy Curtis: 1.6%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon5.1%This article: 4.7%Amy Curtis: 9.9%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion4.7%This article: 5.6%Amy Curtis: 2.9%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question5.6%This article: 10.8%Amy Curtis: 2.9%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 1.5%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 19.2%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof19.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.0%Amy Curtis: 2.7%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal1.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 2.3%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.2%Amy Curtis: 0.4%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading3.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.6%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.5%Amy Curtis: 4.4%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote9.5%This article: 3.9%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection3.9%This article: 18.2%Amy Curtis: 24.5%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice18.2%This article: 7.7%Amy Curtis: 8.1%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination7.7%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Amy Curtis: 22.0%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias1.8%This article: 4.1%Amy Curtis: 6.1%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.1%

1081 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers13%attributed speech937writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 63 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 55 words • 100.0% coverageMike Johnson • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 30 words • 100.0% coverageMike Johnson • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageScott Jennings • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mike Johnson

100%flagged-word coverage
133 attributed words92% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice+26.2 ptsWriter: 15.2%Mike Johnson: 41.4%41.4%Indoctrination+16.9 ptsWriter: 5.7%Mike Johnson: 22.6%22.6%Unattributed Quote-11.0 ptsWriter: 11.0%Mike Johnson: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Mike Johnson: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Mike Johnson: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%Mike Johnson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.