Keyword summary
78%3 analyzed articles/videos2,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Credit results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,174 hits. Analysis detected 10,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,084 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,961 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Credit is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Tax Credit
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
55%Tax Credit (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,084
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate