Townhall86%

Six Charged in $20 Million Medicare 5%

By Scott McClallen27%

7/10/2026, 8:00:55 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 2,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,363 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.5% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,259 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the article peer group.

Oh, You Knew This View Co-Host Was Going to Go There Regarding Marco... 
The Socialist Who Recruited Graham Platner Was Banned from This Dem Rep's Campaign.... 
The Democrats' Favorite Streamer Is Begging for a Defamation Lawsuit 
Joe & Mika Display Platner Denialism; Time Magazine Zeroes in on the Big... 
The Usual Suspects Are Attacking Queen Camilla for Meeting With J.K. 
Rowling 
The FCC Chair Casts Doubt on ABC's Claim That 'The View' Is a... 
Scott Jennings Says Clean Voter Rolls Are Just Common Sense 
Gavin Newsom Got Testy With Reporters Who Asked About His Tax Returns 
Two NYC Churches Were Firebombed, and Zohran Mamdani's Hasn't Said a Word 
This Is the One Chart Democrats Won’t Want You to See 
Chinese National Sentenced to 70 Months for $2.2 Million Gift Card Laundering Scheme 
Treasury Slaps Sanctions on Iran Supreme Leader's Personal Banker 
Platner Officially Calls It Quits  But Exits With a Profane Far-Left Message 
Charlotte Auto Theft Ring Leader Sentenced to 8 Years for Stealing Over 100... 
Six people have been charged in connection with an alleged scheme to defraud Medicare and Medicaid involving a doctor and other medical professionals issuing medically unnecessary prescriptions to a pharmacist in exchange for cash kickbacks. 
The defendants allegedly caused a loss of about $20,684,264 to Medicare and Medicaid. 
The following individuals were charged by Information in the District of New Jersey on July 7, 2026 and appeared before Judge Karen M. 
Williams in federal district court in Camden in connection with the scheme: 
Sherif Elmasri, 45, of Morganville, New Jersey, pled guilty to a two-count Information charging him with conspiring to commit health care fraud and to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute on June 16, 2025. 
Boris Veysman, 48, of Freehold, New Jersey, pled guilty to a two-count Information charging him with conspiring to commit health care fraud and unlawfully distribute controlled substances on June 17, 2025. 
Stephanie Cupo, 45, of South Plainfield, New Jersey, pled guilty to an Information charging her with conspiring to make false statements relating to health care matters and to use a Drug Enforcement Administration registration number issued to another person on January 7, 2026. 
Nikki Steidle, 53, of Toms River, New Jersey, pled guilty to an Information charging her with conspiring to defraud the United States, solicit and receive kickbacks, offer and pay kickbacks, and unlawfully distribute controlled substances on June 30, 2026. 
Janet Tadros, 59, of Union City, New Jersey, pled guilty to a two-count Information charging her with conspiring to commit health care fraud and to violate the Anti-Kickback statute on July 7, 2026. 
“The District of New Jersey remains committed to aggressively rooting out fraud, waste, and abuse committed by doctors, pharmacists, and medical professionals who betray their patients in pursuit of greed. 
Our Office will continue to ensure that those individuals who bilk our insurance systems to line their pockets with taxpayer dollars face swift justice.” 
- U.S. 
Attorney Robert Frazer 
Additionally, Ashlee Maixner, 39, of Lakehurst, New Jersey, was charged by indictment with conspiracy to defraud the United States, solicit and receive kickbacks, offer and pay kickbacks, unlawfully distribute controlled substances, and two counts of soliciting and receiving a kickback. 
Maixner was arraigned before Magistrate Judge André M. 
Espinosa in Newark on June 25, 2026, and pled not guilty. 
“Each of the defendants had a unique role in this alleged scheme, but the common thread is a complete disrespect for the Medicare and Medicaid programs that so many Americans rely on,” said Newark Special Agent in Charge Stefanie Roddy. 
“The defendants defrauded these programs through kickbacks that lined their pockets , while over $20 million taxpayer dollars were quietly disappearing. 
The FBI will continue to root out conspiracies to commit health care fraud and restore balance to a system that will not be shaken by these disrupters.” 
According to documents filed in these cases and statements made in court: 
From October 2022 to November 2025, Elmasri, a pharmacy owner, paid illegal kickbacks and bribes to several health care providers in exchange for them issuing prescriptions for high-reimbursement medications, which Elmasri selected, to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. 
Elmasri personally profited from these prescriptions and the insurance claims it generated for his pharmacies. 
One of the providers involved in the scheme was Dr. 
Boris Veysman, an emergency medicine doctor with offices in New Jersey. 
Elmasri paid Veysman to issue prescriptions recommended by Elmasri to Medicare beneficiaries Elmasri referred to Veysman from approximately May 2023 to December 2024. 
Veysman, at times, did not examine the patients prior to issuing the prescriptions. 
Maixner and Steidle were advanced practice nurses who worked for Veysman and are also alleged to have received illegal kickbacks from Elmasri for issuing prescriptions. 
Cupo also worked for Veysman and submitted prior authorizations with false information to increase the likelihood that the prior authorizations she prepared would be approved by Medicare and other health care benefit programs. 
Separately, Janet Tadros was the office manager of a neurology practice in Jersey City, New Jersey, who, from between December 2023 and November 2025, solicited and received cash kickbacks of approximately $3,000 per week in exchange for sending Elmasri’s pharmacies medically unnecessary prescriptions for patients who were not evaluated nor prescribed the medications and that were sent without the provider’s knowledge or authorization. 
In total, the defendants are alleged to have caused a loss of approximately $20,684,264 to Medicare and Medicaid. 
Veysman, Steidle, and Maixner are separately charged with allegedly conspiring to unlawfully distribute controlled substances to patients without assessing them. 
The charges of conspiracy carry a statutory maximum of five years imprisonment as well as a maximum fine equal to twice the gross gain or twice the gross loss caused by the offense. 
The charges of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and violations of the Anti-Kickback statute each carry a statutory maximum of ten years imprisonment. 
U.S. 
Attorney Frazer credited special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigations, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Stefanie Roddy, the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Naomi Gruchacz, and special agents, task force officers, and diversion investigators with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) New Jersey Field Division, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Towanda R. 
Thorne-James. 
The Department of Justice has established the National Fraud Enforcement Division . 
The core mission of the National Fraud Enforcement Division is to zealously investigate and prosecute those who steal or fraudulently misuse taxpayer dollars. 
The National Fraud Enforcement Division will fulfill that mission by coordinating with agencies responsible for administering benefit programs; partnering with federal, tribal, state, territorial, and local law enforcement on fraud-fighting efforts ; developing systems and processes that ensure efficient identification of fraud against taxpayer dollars; and equipping prosecutors and law enforcement with state-of-the-art tools and resources needed to bring criminal actors to justice. 
The attorneys in the National Fraud Enforcement Division will work every day to protect the financial integrity of our government and the tax system that supports it. 
The government is represented by Assistant U.S. 
Attorney Jake A. 
Nasar of the Healthcare Fraud Unit in Newark and Trial Attorneys Nicholas Peone, Paul J. 
Koob, and Kraig Ahalt of the Department of Justice’s Fraud Section. 
Valuable assistant in the investigation was provided by Assistant U.S. 
Attorney Jessica R. 
Ecker of the Northern District of Illinois. 
The charges and allegations contained in the Indictment against Maixner are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. 
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Oh, You Knew This View Co-Host Was Going to Go There Regarding Marco Rubio 
Diplomacy Finally Caught Up With Reality in Lebanon: Rubio’s Masterstroke 
The FCC Chair Casts Doubt on ABC's Claim That 'The View' Is a 'Bona Fide News Program' 
Trending on Townhall Videos 
Dems Embarrass Themselves on ICE Shooting - Plus Their Party's Shutdowns May Have Led to a Big Issue 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.8%Scott McClallen: 2.3%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic1.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.7%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.3%Townhall: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Scott McClallen: 7.4%Townhall: 11.3%Framing Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.3%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.5%Optimism Bias4.6%This article: 2.0%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias2.0%This article: 20.5%Scott McClallen: 8.4%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias20.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.9%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error4.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Scott McClallen: 2.9%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias2.1%This article: 1.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.0%This article: 2.2%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias1.0%This article: 1.0%Scott McClallen: 0.3%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Scott McClallen: 1.6%Townhall: 5.1%Ad Hominem4.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.2%Scott McClallen: 4.4%Townhall: 4.5%Appeal to Authority18.2%This article: 1.2%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 2.0%False Dilemma1.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.8%Scott McClallen: 2.2%Townhall: 9.2%Hasty Generalization0.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.3%Scott McClallen: 0.6%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon0.3%This article: 18.9%Scott McClallen: 10.3%Townhall: 11.3%Appeal to Emotion18.9%This article: 0.7%Scott McClallen: 1.1%Townhall: 2.3%Begging the Question0.7%This article: 1.3%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.3%This article: 0.9%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.9%This article: 5.1%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.7%Scott McClallen: 1.8%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 2.0%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.8%Scott McClallen: 3.3%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.8%This article: 22.6%Scott McClallen: 5.3%Townhall: 16.2%Biased Writer Voice22.6%This article: 5.6%Scott McClallen: 3.9%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination5.6%This article: 0.9%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.9%This article: 10.6%Scott McClallen: 5.4%Townhall: 13.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias10.6%This article: 7.9%Scott McClallen: 3.6%Townhall: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.9%

1363 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers14%attributed speech1,166writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageScott Jennings • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Attorney Robert Frazer • 30 words • 100.0% coverageU.S. Attorney Robert Frazer • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageStefanie Roddy • 40 words • 100.0% coverageStefanie Roddy • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 63 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Attorney Robert Frazer • 72 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 63 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Stefanie Roddy

100%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words31% of attributed speech34% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+82.2 ptsWriter: 17.8%Stefanie Roddy: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -12.3 ptsWriter: 12.3%Stefanie Roddy: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.2 ptsWriter: 9.2%Stefanie Roddy: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Stefanie Roddy: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Stefanie Roddy: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Stefanie Roddy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.