Topic summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos1,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Television Personalities results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 458 hits. Analysis detected 3,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,954 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (10,837 of 15,769 topics). This Television Personalities is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Television Personalities
Topic details
Total words: 3,954
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos