Author summary
85% 11 analyzed articles/videos 3,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathianne Boniello results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 3,553 hits . Analysis detected 25,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,868 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,149 of 6,172 authors). This Kathianne Boniello is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Kathianne Boniello
Author details
Total words: 15,868
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score11 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.9% 9.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst