Mediaite71%

Van Jones Warns ‘This Stuff Has Gone Too Far’ Amid Rise of Democratic Socialists 89%

By Kathianne Boniello85%

7/21/2026, 12:41:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 1,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 412 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.1% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,380 of 21,182 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the article peer group.

CNN commentator Van Jones said his phone was “blowing up” with calls after he called for Democrats to stand up to socialist candidates with “nutty ideas.” 
Jones, a longtime Democrat, posted on X Monday night that “the response has been overwhelming. 
Leaders in both parties called to tell me the same thing: This stuff has gone too far.” 
His remarks come as far-left Democratic Socialist candidates have shocked the party in recent primary wins in New York City  where Darializa Avila Chevalier (D) defeated longtime Bronx Congressman Adriano Espaillat (D-NY)  and in Colorado, where Democratic Socialist Melat Kiros ousted 15-term Democrat Diana DeGette (D-CO) 
Chevalier previously deleted old social media posts outlining her support for abolishing police and prisons and seizing private property. 
Appearing on CNN’s Erin Burnett OutFront Sunday night with journalist Gretchen Carlson , Van Jones pointed to Chevalier as a prime example of the problem: 
Well, listen, I, cannot tell you. 
This phone has been blowing up all day. 
Governors from both parties, senators from both parties, Democrats in the House calling, thanking me for saying what everybody’s been saying behind the scenes, which is that this stuff is going too far. 
I am a Progressive Democrat. 
You want to talk about prison reform? 
I’ve done it as well as anybody. 
Republican, Democrats in the south with Trump. 
I’ve done prison reform. 
I never said have no prisons. 
Where are you going to put the Klan? 
I’ve done police reform. 
I never said no police. 
Where are you going to put the pedophiles? 
Who’s going to grab the pedophiles? 
This stuff is going too far. 
And part of the thing that has to happen is, we saw what happened in the Republican party when things started going in a nutty direction, and nobody stood up. 
I am happy that the young people are fighting for affordability, a Medicare for all, all the good things, I’ve been waiting my whole life to see a youth movement do what it’s doing, but it’s being hijacked by people who are putting in nutty ideas, supporting terrorists, nutty ideas, saying that we don’t need cops in prisons. 
We can’t. 
We can’t deport anybody, even if they rape somebody. 
Who said this? 
Chevalier. 
Watch above via CNN. 
The post Van Jones Warns ‘This Stuff Has Gone Too Far’ Amid Rise of Democratic Socialists first appeared on Mediaite . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 27.7%Kathianne Boniello: 5.8%Mediaite: 5.0%Confirmation Bias27.7%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Kathianne Boniello: 5.5%Mediaite: 3.7%Availability Heuristic8.3%This article: 8.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.6%Mediaite: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic8.0%This article: 7.3%Kathianne Boniello: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.7%Hindsight Bias7.3%This article: 1.7%Kathianne Boniello: 1.6%Mediaite: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 21.4%Kathianne Boniello: 11.9%Mediaite: 9.1%Framing Effect21.4%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.1%Kathianne Boniello: 1.0%Mediaite: 1.2%Optimism Bias14.1%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.6%Mediaite: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 46.1%Kathianne Boniello: 22.4%Mediaite: 14.6%Negativity Bias46.1%This article: 1.2%Kathianne Boniello: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.9%Mediaite: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.9%Mediaite: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 5.0%Mediaite: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.5%Mediaite: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.5%Mediaite: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Kathianne Boniello: 8.4%Mediaite: 3.8%Ad Hominem6.3%This article: 20.1%Kathianne Boniello: 3.5%Mediaite: 1.2%Straw Man20.1%This article: 17.2%Kathianne Boniello: 4.7%Mediaite: 3.6%Appeal to Authority17.2%This article: 3.6%Kathianne Boniello: 3.9%Mediaite: 2.4%False Dilemma3.6%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.6%Mediaite: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.7%Mediaite: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.9%Kathianne Boniello: 10.3%Mediaite: 7.5%Hasty Generalization11.9%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 11.7%Kathianne Boniello: 2.1%Mediaite: 0.8%Bandwagon11.7%This article: 21.6%Kathianne Boniello: 10.1%Mediaite: 6.7%Appeal to Emotion21.6%This article: 1.9%Kathianne Boniello: 2.3%Mediaite: 1.6%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 7.3%Kathianne Boniello: 2.5%Mediaite: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.3%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 12.1%Kathianne Boniello: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof12.1%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 6.1%Kathianne Boniello: 1.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division6.1%This article: 1.9%Kathianne Boniello: 5.7%Mediaite: 2.8%Anecdotal1.9%This article: 2.7%Kathianne Boniello: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.7%This article: 5.3%Kathianne Boniello: 4.4%Mediaite: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.3%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.5%Kathianne Boniello: 3.7%Mediaite: 3.3%Unattributed Quote1.5%This article: 6.1%Kathianne Boniello: 4.1%Mediaite: 3.2%Quote-first Misdirection6.1%This article: 17.5%Kathianne Boniello: 9.9%Mediaite: 8.3%Biased Writer Voice17.5%This article: 7.3%Kathianne Boniello: 3.5%Mediaite: 1.6%Indoctrination7.3%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.8%Mediaite: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 32.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.8%Mediaite: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias32.0%This article: 1.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.4%Mediaite: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.0%

412 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker74%attributed speech106writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageVan Jones • 26 words • 100.0% coverageVan Jones • 15 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 25 words • 100.0% coverageVan Jones • 6 words • 100.0% coverageVan Jones • 8 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 33 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 5 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 7 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 7 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 7 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 4 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 6 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 8 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 4 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 5 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 8 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 6 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 6 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 30 words • 100.0% coverageVan Jones • 58 words • 100.0% coverageVan Jones • 2 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 9 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 3 words • 0.0% coverageVan Jones • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Van Jones

97%flagged-word coverage
306 attributed words100% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Politically Right Leaning -17.8 ptsWriter: 45.3%Van Jones: 27.5%27.5%Biased Writer Voice+5.7 ptsWriter: 13.2%Van Jones: 19.0%19.0%Indoctrination+9.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Van Jones: 9.8%9.8%Quote-first Misdirection+8.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Van Jones: 8.2%8.2%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Van Jones: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+2.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Van Jones: 2.0%2.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.