Speaker summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 385.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Van Jones results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Straw Man , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 262 hits . Analysis detected 2,129.254 faulty-reasoning hits from 385.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,554 of 28,364 speakers). This Van Jones is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Van Jones
Speaker details
Total words: 385.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.9% percentile 9.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos385.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 33.4% 33.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 18.4% 18.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 15.4% 15.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 32.4% 32.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Straw Man: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst