Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Harsanyi results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 1,879 hits . Analysis detected 14,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,787 of 6,628 authors). This David Harsanyi is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. David Harsanyi
Author details
Total words: 8,172
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 22.8% 22.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.0% 23.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.2% 21.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.0%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 22.8%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst