Author summary
70% 13 analyzed articles/videos 5,463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean James results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 2,904 hits . Analysis detected 24,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,701 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,797 of 6,359 authors). This Sean James is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Sean James
Author details
Total words: 20,701
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score13 analyzed articles20.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst