Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Forbes results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Loss Aversion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 1,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,329 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Forbes is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Forbes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Forbes (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,329
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos