Topic summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wealth results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 579 hits. Analysis detected 3,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,128 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,456 of 15,772 topics). This Wealth is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Wealth
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,128
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos