Author summary
69% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Frederickson results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,231 hits . Analysis detected 6,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,349 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,322 of 6,628 authors). This Emma Frederickson is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Emma Frederickson
Author details
Total words: 8,349
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst