Keyword summary
31%6 analyzed articles/videos2,864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Invesco Qqq Trust results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Recency Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,189 hits. Analysis detected 10,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,666 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,566 of 37,536 keywords). This Invesco Qqq Trust is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Invesco Qqq Trust
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
24%Invesco Qqq Trust (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate