BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 577 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,756 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the article peer group.

Apple on Friday sued OpenAI in federal court in Northern California, alleging trade secret theft, saying that the artificial intelligence lab took the iPhone maker's intellectual property in order to develop its own consumer hardware. 
"This much is clear, however: at every level, from members of its Technical Staff to its Chief Hardware Officer, and in coordination with business partners, OpenAI has been stealing Apple's trade secrets and confidential information," the company said in a legal filing . 
It's a shocking reversal for the two companies, which entered into a high-profile partnership in 2024, when ChatGPT was integrated into the iPhone's operating system. 
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman visited Apple's headquarters for the announcement. 
But relations between the two companies have chilled since OpenAI announced plans to enter the hardware industry last year, when it bought former Apple designer Jony Ive 's startup, called IO Products, for $6.4 billion. 
Apple's updated version of its Siri assistant, which is coming out this fall, is based on Google 's Gemini AI models instead of OpenAI's technology. 
Most of Apple's allegations involve former employees who have interviewed with or joined OpenAI. 
Apple alleged that OpenAI's hardware chief, Tang Tan, who is a former Apple vice president , has directed Apple employees interviewing at OpenAI to share Apple secrets as part of the interviewing process. 
Tan is named as a defendant in the suit. 
"He has directed job candidates still working for Apple to bring 'actual parts' from Apple to their interviews for 'show and tell' sessions in which he and his team at OpenAI can elicit still more Apple confidential information," Apple said in the filing. 
Apple alleged that OpenAI coached departing Apple employees in how to evade security processes when leaving the iPhone maker, and that Chang Liu, a former employee who joined OpenAI, stole an Apple laptop. 
Liu is named as a defendant in the suit. 
It also said that Apple believes OpenAI is asking hardware firms to carry out a metal finishing technique that Apple invented, while "misleading the partner to believe they had Apple's permission to do so." 
"Recently, significant evidence has emerged suggesting individuals employed by OpenAI wrongfully took Apple's secret and confidential information regarding our unreleased technologies, processes, and products," an Apple representative told CNBC in a statement. 
"We have no interest in other companies' trade secrets. 
We remain focused on building innovative technology that empowers people everywhere," a representative for OpenAI said in a statement. 
IO Products is also named in the lawsuit. 
OpenAI hasn't announced when or what its hardware products will be, but Altman said in November that it had finished its first prototypes. 
Apple didn't comment on whether the lawsuit will affect the partnership with OpenAI, which includes the integration of ChatGPT into Apple Intelligence. 
Mounting legal woes present another risk to OpenAI as it gears up for what's expected to be a historic IPO. 
Apple's complaint comes two months after OpenAI won a high-profile trial against Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk . 
A federal jury found that Musk, who helped start OpenAI, had waited too long to sue the AI lab over claims that Altman, co-founder Greg Brockman and the company reneged on agreements to run it as a nonprofit. 
Musk said he would appeal. 
Apple is seeking damages, injunctions, and an order to force OpenAI to stop using its trade secrets. 
WATCH: Apple shares move higher despite losing ground to China 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.3%Kif Leswing: 6.6%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias26.3%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.4%Kif Leswing: 0.6%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 1.5%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Kif Leswing: 3.9%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Kif Leswing: 0.8%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias3.3%This article: 9.5%Kif Leswing: 2.4%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias9.5%This article: 25.0%Kif Leswing: 12.3%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias25.0%This article: 5.7%Kif Leswing: 6.7%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 2.9%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Kif Leswing: 5.1%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.5%Kif Leswing: 1.4%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority5.5%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.4%Kif Leswing: 7.6%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization2.4%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.6%Kif Leswing: 1.9%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 14.9%Kif Leswing: 3.7%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question14.9%This article: 9.4%Kif Leswing: 5.4%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.4%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 20.3%Kif Leswing: 5.1%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof20.3%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.9%Kif Leswing: 1.5%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.9%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 23.7%Kif Leswing: 5.9%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote23.7%This article: 14.9%Kif Leswing: 5.6%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection14.9%This article: 27.0%Kif Leswing: 10.2%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice27.0%This article: 1.6%Kif Leswing: 0.4%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kif Leswing: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Kif Leswing: 1.3%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.7%

577 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers33%attributed speech387writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageApple • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageSam Altman • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageApple • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageApple • 43 words • 100.0% coverageApple • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSam Altman • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageElon Musk • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Apple

100%flagged-word coverage
152 attributed words80% of attributed speech56% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+56.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Apple: 56.6%56.6%Unattributed Quote+43.4 ptsWriter: 13.2%Apple: 56.6%56.6%Biased Writer Voice+29.3 ptsWriter: 20.7%Apple: 50.0%50.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Apple: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Apple: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.