Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,179 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breaking News Technology results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,458 hits . Analysis detected 11,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,868 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (26,627 of 34,832 keywords). This Breaking News Technology is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Breaking News Technology
Keyword details
Total words: 13,868
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst