Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Fountain results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 243 hits . Analysis detected 2,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,596 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,738 of 6,316 authors). This Luke Fountain is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Luke Fountain
Author details
Total words: 3,596
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst