BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 1,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 917 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of 12% (18,688 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  President Donald Trump said he signed an agreement with Iran Wednesday that U.S. officials say calls for Tehran to dilute its stockpile of highly enriched uranium and waive sanctions on the country, immediately allowing Iran to sell its oil freely in a major concession from Washington. 
Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who helped mediate the initial deal to end the war, said it is taking ‘immediate effect’ after leaders from both countries signed it, but that there will still be a formal signing ceremony on Friday. 
The agreement would open the Strait of Hormuz toll-free for two months and affirm a commitment to Lebanon’s territorial integrity in the face of Israel’s invasion against the Hezbollah militant group, according to officials from both countries. 
In a video posted online by a White House aide, Trump is seen seated at a table next to Macron signing a paper copy of the agreement. 
Trump then hands the document and pen to Secretary of State Marco Rubio as people in the room applaud. 
“It’s signed,” Trump said as he left Versailles, the historic palace where he dined with French President Emmanuel Macron following a trip to the Group of Seven summit in France. 
A U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to share details about the agreement, said Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian also signed it Wednesday, though Iran did not immediately comment. 
It wasn’t immediately clear if that act started a 60-day negotiating clock to reach a final deal. 
It was also not clear how Trump’s signing of the deal at Versailles differed from his digital signing on Sunday. 
The draft read by U.S. officials includes language that Iran agrees not to develop or procure nuclear weapons and requires that Iran’s highly enriched uranium be downgraded on site as a minimum. 
In return, the U.S. will move to waive, but not eliminate, some wide-ranging sanctions against Iran. 
The agreement also secures free passage of the strait, the crucial passage for the world’s oil and natural gas and whose closure created a historic energy crisis. 
Since then, Iranian attacks on shipping and the threat to vessels effectively shut the strait. 
The strait’s closure drove up energy prices around the world and made many basics, including food, more expensive. 
Iran let through some vessels that paid tolls, something never done before in the strait, which has long been considered an international waterway. 
The U.S. later provided military support to get other tankers out, but traffic was nowhere near levels before the war. 
The deal also says the U.S. will lift a blockade imposed on Iranian ports and that the strait will return to its prewar traffic levels in 30 days, while acknowledging Iranian mines may need to be destroyed. 
But the interim deal falls short of all those goals, though Trump hailed it Wednesday. 
“Nobody knows what it is, but it’s very strong,” Trump said in France, where he attended a Group of Seven summit. 
But he also opened the door to abandoning it: “It’s a memorandum of understanding, and if I don’t like it, we’ll go back to shooting at them, dropping bombs.” 
The U.S. and Israel went to war on Feb. 28 in part to prevent Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon. 
Trump has cited various goals for the war, including at times vowing it would end Iran’s nuclear and missile programs and its support for Hezbollah and other proxy groups in the region. 
He also suggested it could lead to toppling the Iranian government. 
The accord likely will draw intense opposition in Washington, and it appears to be a major setback for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has come under criticism at home from the media, his opponents and even some allies as details emerge. 
The interim deal falls short of all those goals, but Trump hailed it Wednesday. 
The U.S. agreement to immediately allow Iran to sell its oil freely and the offer to eventually lift all sanctions represent major concessions that go beyond the terms of Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers. 
Trump withdrew America from that Obama-era pact in his first term, declaring it the “worst deal ever.” 
The Islamic Republic maintains that its nuclear program is peaceful. 
The interim deal also opens the door to ending all sanctions Iran faces from the U.S. and at the U.N.  including those over Tehran’s weapons programs and human rights abuses  though it says the schedule for that will be worked out later. 
Still, that far surpasses the 2015 deal, which only lifted some sanctions in exchange for Iran drastically reducing its enrichment and stockpile of uranium. 
The accord would also provide Iran with at least $300 billion to rebuild  an extraordinary figure and another major benefit for Iran. 
The money also appears dependent on the progress of further negotiations. 
Vance has said Gulf Arab nations would invest that amount. 
But Gulf countries would likely be reluctant to help Iran after Iranian attacks in the war destroyed oil facilities and other sites in their territory. 
Trump reiterated Wednesday that the U.S. would not contribute and said it was up to other countries if they wanted to invest. 
Gambrell reported from Dubai. 
Magdy reported from Cairo. 
Catalini reported from Morrisville, Pennsylvania. 
Associated Press writers Aamer Madhani in Evian-les-Bains, France, Darlene Superville in Geneva, Angela Charlton in Paris and Munir Ahmed in Islamabad contributed to this story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Michelle L. Price: 1.8%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Michelle L. Price: 2.5%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic2.9%This article: 2.5%Michelle L. Price: 0.7%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Michelle L. Price: 2.9%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias2.3%This article: 16.6%Michelle L. Price: 10.0%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect16.6%This article: 1.7%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.7%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.5%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 3.8%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.8%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias7.0%This article: 17.4%Michelle L. Price: 10.2%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias17.4%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 2.0%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Michelle L. Price: 1.1%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.5%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.3%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Michelle L. Price: 1.2%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.1%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Michelle L. Price: 0.5%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.7%Michelle L. Price: 3.6%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority5.7%This article: 3.2%Michelle L. Price: 1.6%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma3.2%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.7%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.7%Michelle L. Price: 2.1%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.2%Michelle L. Price: 4.5%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion3.2%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.5%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.6%Michelle L. Price: 2.5%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.6%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.3%Michelle L. Price: 0.7%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.3%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.3%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.3%Michelle L. Price: 1.5%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.3%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 4.4%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.3%Michelle L. Price: 1.6%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 36.4%Michelle L. Price: 4.6%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice36.4%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.4%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

917 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers23%attributed speech707writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 100.0% coverageShehbaz Sharif • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

64%flagged-word coverage
145 attributed words69% of attributed speech62% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-47.2 ptsWriter: 47.2%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+14.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 14.5%14.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.