Keyword summary
44% 25 analyzed articles/videos 14,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctions And Embargoes results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 5,976 hits . Analysis detected 44,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,931 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (32,534 of 34,582 keywords). This Sanctions And Embargoes is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Sanctions And Embargoes
Keyword details
Total words: 60,931
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score25 analyzed articles60.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst