Author summary
73%7 analyzed articles/videos2,454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Riccardi results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 2,880 hits. Analysis detected 19,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,499 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,819 of 6,244 authors). This Nicholas Riccardi is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Nicholas Riccardi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
39%Nicholas Riccardi (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,499
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.4%14.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate