Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OLEG CETINIC results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 291 hits . Analysis detected 1,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,086 of 6,280 authors). This OLEG CETINIC is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. OLEG CETINIC
Author details
Total words: 2,588
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst