Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SYLVIE CORBET results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 868 hits. Analysis detected 6,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,918 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,796 of 6,195 authors). This SYLVIE CORBET is better (less manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
SYLVIE CORBET
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
23%SYLVIE CORBET (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,918
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510022.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate