Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Gillies results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 659 hits . Analysis detected 5,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,630 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,358 of 6,628 authors). This Rob Gillies is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Rob Gillies
Author details
Total words: 9,630
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst