Author summary
73% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,305 analyzed words
BS Summary: These GEIR MOULSON results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 855 hits . Analysis detected 4,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,310 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,273 of 6,625 authors). This GEIR MOULSON is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. GEIR MOULSON
Author details
Total words: 3,310
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.8% percentile 4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 25.8% 25.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.1% 15.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.6% 3.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 25.8%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst