BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 793 faulty-reasoning hits from 275 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,050 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the article peer group.

Officials in Russia-occupied Crimea suspended civilian gasoline sales Sunday as Ukraine ramped up attacks on fuel supplies on the Black Sea peninsula. 
Gov. 
Sergey Aksyonov, the Kremlin-appointed head o Crimea, said that overnight Ukrainian strikes killed four people and wounded 28 others. 
He did not specify the target of the attack. 
He later wrote on social media that local gas stations would halt all sales to non-state companies and individuals for an undefined period. 
“Fuel will be sold only to government agencies that ensure the functioning and security of the Republic of Crimea,” Aksyonov said. 
“I ask everyone to remain calm and to only trust official sources of information.” 
Ukrainian forces have repeatedly targeted fuel supplies to Crimea in recent weeks, triggering the worst energy crisis in the region since it was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014. 
At the end of May, authorities restricted the sale of gas to 20 liters (5 1/3 gallons) per vehicle owner per week, using prepaid coupons. 
Those were snapped up immediately following their release on an official messaging app channel, and motorists lined up for hours, waiting to refuel. 
Social networks have been abuzz with requests and advice on where to find fuel, and authorities launched a hotline for tourists in the area who have found themselves trapped. 
However, Ukraine’s successes have highlighted its ability to inflict painful damage on Russia and change the course of the conflict while Moscow’s advances recently have ground to a near halt. 
On June 11, Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine reached its 1,569th day, surpassing the duration of World War I. 
___ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.8%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%The Associated Press: 1.4%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias6.9%This article: 8.4%The Associated Press: 3.2%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic8.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 34.9%The Associated Press: 11.1%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect34.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.1%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%The Associated Press: 1.7%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias10.9%This article: 28.0%The Associated Press: 11.0%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias28.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%The Associated Press: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error6.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.9%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 21.5%The Associated Press: 2.0%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias21.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.5%The Associated Press: 3.8%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority13.5%This article: 10.9%The Associated Press: 1.2%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma10.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.3%The Associated Press: 3.0%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization19.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.6%The Associated Press: 5.6%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 7.6%The Associated Press: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question7.6%This article: 22.2%The Associated Press: 2.8%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)22.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 21.1%The Associated Press: 1.3%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal21.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.7%The Associated Press: 1.7%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.9%The Associated Press: 1.8%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote6.9%This article: 7.6%The Associated Press: 1.2%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection7.6%This article: 21.5%The Associated Press: 3.9%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice21.5%This article: 5.1%The Associated Press: 0.7%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination5.1%This article: 10.9%The Associated Press: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

275 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker31%attributed speech189writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSergey Aksyonov • 19 words • 100.0% coverageSergey Aksyonov • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSergey Aksyonov • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSergey Aksyonov • 21 words • 100.0% coverageSergey Aksyonov • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sergey Aksyonov

100%flagged-word coverage
86 attributed words100% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-31.2 ptsWriter: 31.2%Sergey Aksyonov: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+24.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sergey Aksyonov: 24.4%24.4%Unattributed Quote+22.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sergey Aksyonov: 22.1%22.1%Indoctrination+16.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sergey Aksyonov: 16.3%16.3%Politically Left Leaning B-15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%Sergey Aksyonov: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.