Topic summary
79% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Industry results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 6,189 hits . Analysis detected 36,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,172 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (11,646 of 15,769 topics). This Energy Industry is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Energy Industry
Topic details
Total words: 36,172
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score12 analyzed articles36.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst