Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nicholas Beuret results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 820 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Nicholas Beuret is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nicholas Beuret
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Nicholas Beuret (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,484
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.0%11.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 1.2%1.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos