Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 9,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Rising results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 5,389 hits . Analysis detected 31,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,863 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,828 of 6,244 authors). This David Rising is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. David Rising
Author details
Total words: 31,863
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles31.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.9% 16.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst