Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Melzer results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 841 hits . Analysis detected 4,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,908 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,113 of 6,162 authors). This Natalie Melzer is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Natalie Melzer
Author details
Total words: 6,908
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst