Author summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Quinn results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 844 hits. Analysis detected 6,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,276 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (6,488 of 6,603 authors). This Patrick Quinn is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Patrick Quinn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠2%Patrick Quinn (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,276
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
1.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos